Many cry for freedom of the judiciary, and they are right: it is sacrosanct. But so should be sacrosanct to reiterate one thing: in Italy there are thousands of laws (many liberticide) in contrast to what happens in other countries. This largely depends on the politicians and rulers: in all its sectors. Read confused, a thick soup of words, subwords, double meanings, and only these paragraphs rendered unconscious for a willingness to accommodate more Riddle possible. And here's yet another
law. Here's a new law came perhaps to close the web, and make it a sterile and died the same way as the TV: where those little pools of water are constantly being polluted or covered with earth, there is always someone pushing for the arid . A new law came from wanting to transform the Web, sites, in a large TV. Here is a step
ambiguous in the legislation (by-Step Informatico.it ), which seeks to define a "clear" do you mean by "audiovisual media service" (ie, sites to be transformed into style TV with complaints, permits, inspections regime in place, flaws):
- whose main objective [of sites comparable to the TV] is the provision of programs in order to inform, entertain or educate the general public -
Objective "main ? Who and how do we define then the secondary or tertiary? Under
instead the words the legislature used to determine the sites not in the spirit of the octopus:
- services performed in primarily non-economic activities and which are not in competition with television broadcasting - About
and how to determine when an activity begins or ends "primarily" economica? E poi: qual è la “concorrenza con la radiodiffusione televisiva”?
- i servizi la cui finalità principale non è la fornitura di programmi -
Chi e come si definisce “la finalità principale”? E soprattutto: come e quando si può definire un “programma”? Si dovrebbe pensare forse a concetti altrettanto plasmabili e astratti come “informare, intrattenere o istruire il grande pubblico”?
- i servizi nei quali il contenuto audiovisivo è meramente incidentale e non ne costituisce la finalità principale -
“Meramente incidentale”? Ma è una presa per i fondelli? Immediatamente vien da pensare anche un’altra thing: videoblogger, graphics, music videos, short films and movies, even if self-produced and distributed online, be regarded as the TV?
on everything you can add a remark: the souls within Europe, as the everything is born from the will, to some extent distorted , of European regulations, are more or less like the Italian ones, not for nothing that Italy is part of Europe, but here in the boot there is often more in touch maccheronico that makes everyone more happy. Hope for the "Nobel of Peace" on the Internet? It all depends on freedom.
PS
The top of the top remains in the quote George Orwell Style that members of the Inner Party have written:
-Internet sites that contain [...] a product or non-audiovisual service [...]
f) the games' Gambling with money placed in
What about: ROFL!
ambiguous in the legislation (by-Step Informatico.it ), which seeks to define a "clear" do you mean by "audiovisual media service" (ie, sites to be transformed into style TV with complaints, permits, inspections regime in place, flaws):
- whose main objective [of sites comparable to the TV] is the provision of programs in order to inform, entertain or educate the general public -
Objective "main ? Who and how do we define then the secondary or tertiary? Under
instead the words the legislature used to determine the sites not in the spirit of the octopus:
- services performed in primarily non-economic activities and which are not in competition with television broadcasting - About
and how to determine when an activity begins or ends "primarily" economica? E poi: qual è la “concorrenza con la radiodiffusione televisiva”?
- i servizi la cui finalità principale non è la fornitura di programmi -
Chi e come si definisce “la finalità principale”? E soprattutto: come e quando si può definire un “programma”? Si dovrebbe pensare forse a concetti altrettanto plasmabili e astratti come “informare, intrattenere o istruire il grande pubblico”?
- i servizi nei quali il contenuto audiovisivo è meramente incidentale e non ne costituisce la finalità principale -
“Meramente incidentale”? Ma è una presa per i fondelli? Immediatamente vien da pensare anche un’altra thing: videoblogger, graphics, music videos, short films and movies, even if self-produced and distributed online, be regarded as the TV?
on everything you can add a remark: the souls within Europe, as the everything is born from the will, to some extent distorted , of European regulations, are more or less like the Italian ones, not for nothing that Italy is part of Europe, but here in the boot there is often more in touch maccheronico that makes everyone more happy. Hope for the "Nobel of Peace" on the Internet? It all depends on freedom.
PS
The top of the top remains in the quote George Orwell Style that members of the Inner Party have written:
-Internet sites that contain [...] a product or non-audiovisual service [...]
f) the games' Gambling with money placed in
What about: ROFL!
0 comments:
Post a Comment