Un Iran dispotico potrebbe essere definito come un luogo non ameno per lo sviluppo del mondo. Tutte le dittature sono un rigetto del mondo. Una “stranezza” che affonda le proprie forze in violence and weapons. Maybe the media are pushing the "Iran problem" to reach out to the state of Israel, or for fear that a power like Iran to become an element of imbalance in the global context, and especially that of the East (a new Saddam) or maybe it really is a shame that a country like this, with a story that is central to the world along with its geographical position, sink into an abyss destructive (for the rest of the world). Unfortunately, Iran is only one piece in the puzzle of dictatorships (do not know if it is among the hardest because there are still events and blogs). Often the murders, the civil liberty abuses and "bestial" many other schemes are being neglected, or are used only rarely. The most striking case is China: the world's largest dictatorship. Are rare and sporadic, but all important and basic items that come to us from Eastern Turkestan and Tibet (half that of China occupied by the military) are abundant and hateful the news on death sentences, as well as stunning in their simplicity ( elemental analysis of reality) news censorship on the internet and elsewhere. Then there are all other countries, the Sino-Soviet axis: Vietnam, Burma, North Korea, etc ... A blob of reddish color. Moving to the other side we find the South America, Africa and some other countries Asian or European level: all under the same banner of the degradation of human civilization and social development. Currently, priority is given to Iran, but the old Persia is the first of many. dictatorships, although the methods can sometimes be complex (essentially depends on technology and culture, among other more developed in the context of freedom and progress), its sights are simple and elementary: Pheromone, chocolate, oil, cement and weapons. Democracies are slightly more complex, and analyze them, without prejudices and limitations, is not an easy task. One criticism must be balanced, realistic, can not ignore all the forces in play, and especially must strive to improve what already exists. As part of a dialectic of this kind, in a constructive dialogue with another person, we must never forget that a question correctly and usually follows, with the hypothetical interlocutor who would say something like: "Do not complain and say that you live in a country or a little pseudo free even if democratic, because there are places, see Iran, where you can express your ideas, where you just can not complain "While this maximum is simple:" If I was born in a democratic country, if I live in a democratic country, for democracy if I breathed a lifetime, it is logical that my socio-political frame of reference is directly proportional to the status in which I lived, if you were born in a dictatorship of the few freedoms I'd be happy that I can aim, but being in a particular context I will try to make improvements in that same context, in short, aiming to study the past to the future " .
E 'began a year. The change, although in the context of the needs, often becomes a process of slow. A change hath been revealed in the Oval Office in Washington. A breath of information hath been had by treating topics uncomfortable to the premier. Still there is a sea per poter iniziare a vedere qualche verità sui media, sul conflitto di interessi, sui monopoli. Qualche tempo fa apparve su Repubblica un articolo che “gioiva” alla diffusione di alcuni libri “proibiti” in Nord Corea, ed erano accennati dei passi di George Orwell, preso a modello come libero pensatore nel contesto bolscevica e comunista: pareva quasi che 1984 fosse stato scritto per i comunisti e contro i comunisti (strano che su Focus lo stesso scrittore britannico venne definito “comunista”). Mancavano, nelle citazioni, dei passi forse importanti, mentre stavano citate alcune righe riguardanti un libro di storia per bambini, e la relazione tra la figura del Grande Fratello e il Partito (espressamente associato Republic from the Communist Party). So, you want to quote Orwell, it means becoming a communist or anticommunist: This is the only solution except for the total elimination (burning) of his books. But here's what you are probably forgot to write:
"Somewhere brains were thinking, strictly anonymous, who coordinated everything and fix the policies which imposed to preserve, falsify or destroy a particular fragment of the past." " There they produced papers that contained only trash sport, the facts of crime news, horoscopes, novelettes, films crammed with sex, and sentimental songs composed by a kind of kaleidoscope called 'Versifier'. Not missing an entire subsection (Pornosez, in Newspeak) engaged in the production of pornographic material " " The hard work, care of the house and children, petty quarrels with neighbors, films, football, beer, and especially gambling, limiting their horizons. " " The rocket bombs which fell all the day on London were probably dropped by the government of Oceania 'to keep people in fear' " " On a concrete level, however, the war involves only a small number of people, for the most part highly specialized troops, and causes relatively small losses. The fighting, when there is, they occur in border towns whose location is virtually unknown to the common man. " " At the same time, the knowledge that in war, and therefore in danger, makes the concentration of all power in the hands of a small caste seem the only and unavoidable condition in order to survive. "
is the number of Republic today (December 27, 2009), a summary of some forty pages (the rest are shows, tv, sports and local news): First page headlines: "Terrorism, the fear returns flight " 11 + 1 pages were devoted to terrorism and war, safety of the Pope, Iran and Afghanistan and their wickedness, to Al Qaeda 9 pages of advertising (full page) 7 pages of crime news, weather and gossip 4 pages of curiosity (animals, wine, "Cortina d'Ampezzo and Madonna di Campiglio) 3 pages of political reforms to the summary of Berlusconi, and a little 'space at the PD and "all'inciucio" 3 pages of economy
PS Here's the part quoted by the Republic in "Reading Orwell in Pyongyang on 28 October 2009: " He took the children's history book and looked at the portrait of Big Brother that stood on the front. I His eyes stared at him, hypnotics. It was as if some immense force crush you, something that penetrated the skull and there pounding the brain, to instil the fear of having personal opinions and almost persuading them to deny the evidence of what they will send you directions. One day the party would have proclaimed that two plus two equals five, and you would have to believe it. It was inevitable that sooner or later it happens, was in the very premises upon which it was based of the Party. (...) But the terrible thing was not so much that you would kill if you had thought otherwise, but that they could be right. After all, how do we know that two plus two equals four? "Certainly Orwell took as a reference to the Soviet sad events, but if the Animal Farm is clearly dedicated to the famous party "equality" and its vicissitudes, 1984 is something more, is an expansion of thought that extends and embraces the world, the foggy London of 1800 to smokey Shanghai 2099.
