Un Iran dispotico potrebbe essere definito come un luogo non ameno per lo sviluppo del mondo. Tutte le dittature sono un rigetto del mondo. Una “stranezza” che affonda le proprie forze in violence and weapons.
Maybe the media are pushing the "Iran problem" to reach out to the state of Israel, or for fear that a power like Iran to become an element of imbalance in the global context, and especially that of the East (a new Saddam) or maybe it really is a shame that a country like this, with a story that is central to the world along with its geographical position, sink into an abyss destructive (for the rest of the world). Unfortunately, Iran is only one piece in the puzzle of dictatorships (do not know if it is among the hardest because there are still events and blogs). Often the murders, the civil liberty abuses and "bestial" many other schemes are being neglected, or are used only rarely. The most striking case is China: the world's largest dictatorship. Are rare and sporadic, but all important and basic items that come to us from Eastern Turkestan and Tibet (half that of China occupied by the military) are abundant and hateful the news on death sentences, as well as stunning in their simplicity ( elemental analysis of reality) news censorship on the internet and elsewhere. Then there are all other countries, the Sino-Soviet axis: Vietnam, Burma, North Korea, etc ... A blob of reddish color. Moving to the other side we find the South America, Africa and some other countries Asian or European level: all under the same banner of the degradation of human civilization and social development. Currently, priority is given to Iran, but the old Persia is the first of many.
dictatorships, although the methods can sometimes be complex (essentially depends on technology and culture, among other more developed in the context of freedom and progress), its sights are simple and elementary: Pheromone, chocolate, oil, cement and weapons. Democracies are slightly more complex, and analyze them, without prejudices and limitations, is not an easy task. One criticism must be balanced, realistic, can not ignore all the forces in play, and especially must strive to improve what already exists. As part of a dialectic of this kind, in a constructive dialogue with another person, we must never forget that a question correctly and usually follows, with the hypothetical interlocutor who would say something like: "Do not complain and say that you live in a country or a little pseudo free even if democratic, because there are places, see Iran, where you can express your ideas, where you just can not complain "While this maximum is simple:" If I was born in a democratic country, if I live in a democratic country, for democracy if I breathed a lifetime, it is logical that my socio-political frame of reference is directly proportional to the status in which I lived, if you were born in a dictatorship of the few freedoms I'd be happy that I can aim, but being in a particular context I will try to make improvements in that same context, in short, aiming to study the past to the future " .
Maybe the media are pushing the "Iran problem" to reach out to the state of Israel, or for fear that a power like Iran to become an element of imbalance in the global context, and especially that of the East (a new Saddam) or maybe it really is a shame that a country like this, with a story that is central to the world along with its geographical position, sink into an abyss destructive (for the rest of the world). Unfortunately, Iran is only one piece in the puzzle of dictatorships (do not know if it is among the hardest because there are still events and blogs). Often the murders, the civil liberty abuses and "bestial" many other schemes are being neglected, or are used only rarely. The most striking case is China: the world's largest dictatorship. Are rare and sporadic, but all important and basic items that come to us from Eastern Turkestan and Tibet (half that of China occupied by the military) are abundant and hateful the news on death sentences, as well as stunning in their simplicity ( elemental analysis of reality) news censorship on the internet and elsewhere. Then there are all other countries, the Sino-Soviet axis: Vietnam, Burma, North Korea, etc ... A blob of reddish color. Moving to the other side we find the South America, Africa and some other countries Asian or European level: all under the same banner of the degradation of human civilization and social development. Currently, priority is given to Iran, but the old Persia is the first of many.
dictatorships, although the methods can sometimes be complex (essentially depends on technology and culture, among other more developed in the context of freedom and progress), its sights are simple and elementary: Pheromone, chocolate, oil, cement and weapons. Democracies are slightly more complex, and analyze them, without prejudices and limitations, is not an easy task. One criticism must be balanced, realistic, can not ignore all the forces in play, and especially must strive to improve what already exists. As part of a dialectic of this kind, in a constructive dialogue with another person, we must never forget that a question correctly and usually follows, with the hypothetical interlocutor who would say something like: "Do not complain and say that you live in a country or a little pseudo free even if democratic, because there are places, see Iran, where you can express your ideas, where you just can not complain "While this maximum is simple:" If I was born in a democratic country, if I live in a democratic country, for democracy if I breathed a lifetime, it is logical that my socio-political frame of reference is directly proportional to the status in which I lived, if you were born in a dictatorship of the few freedoms I'd be happy that I can aim, but being in a particular context I will try to make improvements in that same context, in short, aiming to study the past to the future " .
0 comments:
Post a Comment