Silver City Imax Ottawa

Republic of the "fact of the Day on BBC2 from 14 to 14.45

The Fact of the Day is a transmission going on Rai in the early afternoon, and can only be the result of nihilism and intellectual leveling out. Certainly the situation is worse on Mediaset, to 'encephalogram piatto si aggiunge anche la cattiva qualità, ma purtroppo Mediaset è ancora in mano al cavaliere di Arcore e alla sua schiera si tirapiedi.

Nel programma sul Due ogni giorno c’è una domanda posta ai telespettatori, che grazie al telefono possono svolgere uno pseudo sondaggio, in diretta, su quelli che sono i fatti politici del giorno (o della settimana se si prolungano). Oggi la domanda era:

“I giudici in Italia svolgono un ruolo eccessivamente politico?”

I telespettatori avrebbero dovuto chiamare al numero a pagamento (classico esempio di parassitismo) e digitare 1 per rispondere “Si”, 2 per il “No”. Non bisogna esser un philologist to understand the bias of such an application, simply remove the question from the word "too" with it is that the whole concept takes on a meaning more clear, more radical, it presupposes, in short, that courts already exist in a political and this proves that sometimes "excessive." Here's how the sentence would have been without quell'avverbio: "Judges play a political role in Italy?" In and of itself an application in bad faith, but with the addition of "excessively" reinforces the bias, the double face in this case should pave, in the minds of Italians, the road to judicial reform This program P2. In
"Done Day" so malicious applications are the norm, are daily, are the result of the directives of the network, the Berlusconi government. Every day, harangued the viewer (the housewife, housewives, pensioners, workers paused) with their flat applications, deployed, motivated by the dictates of Palazzo Grazioli, and on those who played a large part of the interaction viewer-tv and therefore also of the audience. What kind of a sleazy theater have set up? Making interactive questions means to rise to impartiality? Because if someone raises the question that "the courts can play a political role" just because not to be condescending in re Silvio, then there are many other questions to which "The Fact of the Day" (hidden intentions to the viewer unaware) could give an answer like:

"Roma steal babies?"
"Immigrants steal work to Italians? "
" The Communists do children eat? "
" The PD is a hotbed of Bolsheviks? "
" Di Pietro is violent language? "
" Santoro insults because he feels pleasure in doing it? "
"The government is governing well Berlsuconi?"
"Berlusconi is the best prime minister of the last 150 years?"
"The reform of justice is good for Italy?"
"The P2 is a functional body to democracy?"


etc. ... Anybody can have fun to make and invent all applications that hide from a fundamental logic: the bias and vomiting in the face of its viewers (most ignorant and unaware, too distracted or too bogged down), the shaping of the minds with theaters disguised as talk shows, the influence the priorities of Italian through interactive questions that focus on where the authors, and managers employed by the government, want it to be placed.

Masterbate Electric Toothbrush

The meaning of Striscia la Notizia

She had never seen any tissue blasted a respected and well known journalist of the Italian television, and yet it happened. Yesterday's was just another icing on the cake of manure that Mediaset lit for slapping the culture. But you know, that's a little program (with several million viewers) which easily and often, approached shamelessly delicate topics, and half-naked little women, culture and information (or pseudo) to gossip and dolls with the suction cups to uncork the toilet. The show of showgirls who repeated the term written by the authors (or perhaps, the same Antonio Ricci) was in some ways un'ennesima conferma, ma che tipo di programma è?

POLITICA
Mettere sotto la gogna degli insulti gratuiti l’eventuale avversario (del sultano), tempestandolo di pseduo-satira (vi ricordate il “fù fù” di D’alema che si soffiava sui pugni a guisa di tic?), emettendo una mole possente di denigrazione. Ad esempio i frequenti richiami a Cosa Nostra quando (giustamente^^) si parla dell’UDC; l’etichettatura a “comunisti” dei politici della sinistra; l’etichettatura a “sinistrorsi” dei giornalisti che lo criticano; o i frequenti accostamenti tra il fascismo e i vari politici di AN.
Parlare di Berlusconi è invece un ridurre tutto his baldness and his little women (with an ending theme when s'inneggiava to "daddy" and Beelzebub). Relations with Craxi, his experiences with Dell'Utri and Mangano, never existed, and if they spoke a strange case, all hath been reduced to a couple of times in twenty years of daily broadcasts. In short, never mention the past or present relationship between foreign assets and Forza Italy. Another sore point, the conflict of interest, probably, even more Dell'Utri and Mangano (since there is one of the major worms of this democracy), the taboo must remain hidden (so to speak Emilio Fede but the Matrix or TG5 with recipes for pina grandmother does not affect them).

INFORMATION
deal with serious themes. Environmental and social injustices, deception and fraud: the result of a state of things still to be underdeveloped and uncivilized (in the face of civilization, "Western"). Sure!, Everything is beautiful. But considering the frequency information of these interludes alternated with girlie, trash television, mistakes and bloopers, the soup is reduced to a few spaces at a time. These few areas are used to amplify the resonance of a given problem, to make it visible to a large number of people: an admirable use of the medium, but that leaves the time is when you stay on the surface, do not you go to dig in the cases, most of the time various types of collusion, and ambiguous relationships between institutions, citizens and strange areas. In short, once out of ten we give voice to the frustrations of citizens, but do not say that these frustrations have emerged. And even when it is said, would be a little 'how to empty a pond in a glass of clean water with his left arm, while with the right will continue to throw buckets of shit.

VARIETA'-VERITA'-LOL?
often have fun too. There is also the mood of lightness that makes the show watchable in moments of relaxation, or while eating. Unfortunately, a bit 'as the speech information sipped with the dropper, but the laughs are rare, like those clenched teeth of the Week Enigmistica. Bisogna dire infatti che la professione di comico è diversa da quella di autore. Certamente gli autori di Striscia sono gente simpatica, con la verve creativa e divertente, ma tutto un altro discorso rispetto ai veri comici. Per non parlare della satira: sarebbe come paragonare il Po’ al Rio delle Amazzoni. Rimane, come suddetto, il velo della comicità, ma è così leggero da lasciare raramente il sorriso sulle facce delle persone anche dopo la sigla di chiusura. Insomma: i comici fanno i comici (alcuni satira, non a Zelig), gli autori fanno gli autori (pagati da Berlusconi&Co).